Why the Bush administration is forcing Israel to break the truce

As the US fall elections draw near, the political window of opportunity for the Bush administration to attack Iran’s nuclear infrastructure is closing. The Bush administration need hard proof in the form of advanced Iran and Chinese made missiles or components to build the public opinion case in America as pretext to move the next phase of the 8022 Iran attack plan. MOSSAD and US Space Command were unable so far to intercept the missile shipments from China, via Syria to Lebanon needed to make the case.

According to the Financial Times, Monday August 21, 2006, “the government also wants to prevent rocket attacks on Israel by Palestinian groups based in southern refugee camps”… Elias Murr, Lebanon defense minister “warned that any retaliatory attacks against Israel would be treated as “treason” against the Lebanese state.

The weekend Israeli commando failure was one of the most public revealed Israeli intelligence breakdowns in the history of the modern state of Israel and its intelligence services. Over a hundred Israeli forces were unnecessary put into a Hezbollah kill zone in order to try and find Chinese missile components and to provoke a political event to break the fragile week-old truce as a pretext to attack Iran.

The TV reports of the tactical surface to surface Chinese designed Saeqa missile with a range of 50-160 miles test 24 hours after the failed United States order Israel raid into the Bekaa region, has retriggered Israeli fears of the potential of a Hezbollah missile attack and the helplessness of the Israeli Armed force and US Space Command to protect them
from Hezbollah missile attack.

As the Israelis public continue their public examination of the over the conduct of the war and why the Israeli armed forces were used by the Bush Administration to serve the US oil lobby interests rather than protecting the national security concerns of the northern Israeli cities, one outcome already is clear: Hezbollah is being rearmed with more deadly advanced Chinese missiles and other weapon systems. It’s clear to the Israeli population that the Israeli antimissile shield cannot protect the cities from a massive Hezbollah tactical non-nuclear missile attack and it time to seriously look at the peace option.

The failed weekend MOSSAD, US Space Command and Israeli commando assault against Hezbollah fighters in the Bekaa area of north-eastern Lebanon reflects the deepen realities of the rearmament of Hezbollah with advanced Chinese missiles and infrastructure.

According to the New Yorker magazine article 8/14/2006-“Watching Lebanon” by Seymour M. Hersh”—“Israel intelligence estimated …Hezbollah had roughly five hundred medium-range Fajri-3 and Fajri-5 and a few dozen long-range Zelzal rockets: the Zelzal, with a range of about two hundred kilometers, that could reach Tel Aviv. (One rocket hit Haifa the day after the kidnapping on July 12, 2006). Hezbollah elected not to launch a massive missile Fajr or Zelzal attack on Tel Aviv or other southern Israeli cities during the war for political reason, not military reasons.

The New York Times knows that Hezbollah had the military means and still has the means to hit cities anywhere in Israel.

Using the New Yorker numbers and the 80 percent reduction of the Hezbollah missile portfolio, claimed of unknown Israeli sources reported in the New York Times, would still leave Hezhollah with over 100 medium range Fajr series missiles and a dozen long-range Zelzal missiles. Hezbollah has unknown amounts of anti ship and anti-tank missiles. Also, Hezbollah has over 10,000 small rackets targeting the 30,000 Israeli ground forces in northern Israel and southern Lebanon.(see Nubianobserver “The danger of the New York Times new analyis:Lebanon” Google.com)

The failed commando assault as demonstrate the critical communication break down between the communications interface of US Space Command and the Israeli military in their losing shell game they are playing with Hezbollah’s missile command.