Wednesday, October 11, 2006

US National boycott of Chinese goods ICBMs for Japan

National Boycott of Chinese before North Korea becomes the Asian Hezbollah with nuclear warheads.

The US mass media and leading newspapers like the New York Times are engaged in a mass misinformation campaign to mislead the American population into believing that North Korean nuclearization is a done deal and is de facto independent of the direct control of the Communist Government of China. Just as the westren media tried to divorce the central role of China in the arming of Hezbollah with advanced missiles, the media to trying to hide the critical role China in North Korean nuclearization to protect the Christmas shopping season sales of US multinatonals reexporting back to America.

The first step in the containment of the North Korean nuclear arms program should be a US national embargo of all Chinese imports and followed by a national boycott of China made imports. The federal, state and local governmental units would be barred from using Chinese imports. The US Navy should enforce the embargo like the Cuban missile crisis. The America people would joint the embargo by not buying Chinese goods. This embargo and boycott would send a clear message to both Chinese leadership and more importantly, the US multinationals operating from China, that Japan’s national security is US national security. If China or North Korean directly threatens the national security of Japan, they threaten the US.

Secondly, the sea-based element of the joint Japanese and US anti missile shield in the Bay of Japan should be reinforced to protect Japan from a massive missile attack from China. This would necessaite 50 ICBM interceptors between deployed between Japan and China in the Sea of Japan.

Thirdly, the US should create the political and military infrastructure to immediately transfer the operational command and control of three US Navy ICBM submarines to the Japanese government and navy. This sea-based ICBM deployment would allow Japan the means to ensure Mutually Assured Destruction of 100 Eastern Chinese industrial centers in the event of a mistaken North Korean or Chinese missile attack on Japan.

The nuclearization of Japan would also allow for the better control of the peace and stability with the region. China would be forced to recalculate its priorities around peaceful promoting internal economic development and a benign relationship with Japan, the region and world. Denuclearization and economic development of the two Koreans would then make sense to the regional powers. MAD worked to keep the peace between the US and the Soviets, why not try it in Asia. Why should China and North Korea be the de facto peace keepers.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home