Best way to Protect American from next 9/11 is to restart Iraqi industrial economy
As Primer Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki makes his first official visit to try and establish better security relations with Iran in a effort to saving Iraq from falling into civil war, The New York Times carries a Op-Ed article outlining a possible US led attack on Iran nuclear infrastructure using northern Iraqi air space as a route of a massive air strike.
Yesterday Nicholas D. Kristof “Starting Another War” once again urged emotionally at risk Americans to consider a US attack on Iran’s nuclear installation suggesting that “a few air raid would make the Iranian nuclear menace disappear”. If MOSSD and the CIA could not find most of Hezbollah long-range missiles in a month of fighting, what makes it easier finding the 3,000 mobile launched missiles hidden all over Iran?
Once Americans understand that anything militarily could stop a massive Iranian missile counter strike on Persian Gulf oil production following a US or Israeli attack, the myth or value of Plan 8022 disappears.
Hezbollah hit and destroyed a moving advanced Israeli war ship, how much more difficult is it for Iran missile to target fixed refineries or platforms in the Persian Gulf?
This Vice President Dick Chancy fantasy, official know as Plan 8022(see Nubianobserver articles on Plan 8022) is in denial of the emerging role China is playing in Iran national defense and the lack of any Saudi Arabian defense against a massive missile attack by Iran on it Persian Gulf oil infrastructure.
It is breathtaking thought after the Israel and US Space Command near totally missed find, much less destroying Hezbollah’s older mobile missile launchers, that anyone would trust them to secure southern Lebanon during a US led attack on Iran much less protect the Saudi oil operations.
The fears of an “Iran making a bomb” are exaggerated in the western newspapers. The political reality of the transference of Chinese nuclear warheads to Iran, following a US strike is a growing reality that is carefully kept out the debate on attacking Iran by writers like Mr. Kristof and the 200 billion dollar US Chinese trade lobby.
Hezbollah missile fire power selectively used against Israeli shipping clearly shows that Iran, without Chinese nuclear heads, has the military means to downgrade most of the oil infrastructure in the Persian and force a world depression, following a pre-emptive US attack. Mr. Kristof is deadly wrong about Middle East countries going nukes. The nuclearization of Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Turkey does not change the defenselessness of the Persian Gulf to missile attack. Only destroying Iran’s nuclear site creates the political conditions for China to arm Iran with nuclear defense. This would give China political hegemony in the Middle East region.
The emotional recklessness of the New York Times article shows no respect for the outpouring of Americans about 9/11 or the military reality 150,000 US troops would after an attack on Iran. Rather than the New York Times suggesting a US tax payer funded national defense shield be build to protect, Mr. Kristof should review that US plans to protect American interest in the Persian Gulf.
The best way to protect American oil interests in the Middle East is to restart and expand the Iraqi industrial economy. Put the Iragi workers but to work. It’s worked in both Germany and Japan following WWII; it called a real Marshall economic recovery plan.
Yesterday Nicholas D. Kristof “Starting Another War” once again urged emotionally at risk Americans to consider a US attack on Iran’s nuclear installation suggesting that “a few air raid would make the Iranian nuclear menace disappear”. If MOSSD and the CIA could not find most of Hezbollah long-range missiles in a month of fighting, what makes it easier finding the 3,000 mobile launched missiles hidden all over Iran?
Once Americans understand that anything militarily could stop a massive Iranian missile counter strike on Persian Gulf oil production following a US or Israeli attack, the myth or value of Plan 8022 disappears.
Hezbollah hit and destroyed a moving advanced Israeli war ship, how much more difficult is it for Iran missile to target fixed refineries or platforms in the Persian Gulf?
This Vice President Dick Chancy fantasy, official know as Plan 8022(see Nubianobserver articles on Plan 8022) is in denial of the emerging role China is playing in Iran national defense and the lack of any Saudi Arabian defense against a massive missile attack by Iran on it Persian Gulf oil infrastructure.
It is breathtaking thought after the Israel and US Space Command near totally missed find, much less destroying Hezbollah’s older mobile missile launchers, that anyone would trust them to secure southern Lebanon during a US led attack on Iran much less protect the Saudi oil operations.
The fears of an “Iran making a bomb” are exaggerated in the western newspapers. The political reality of the transference of Chinese nuclear warheads to Iran, following a US strike is a growing reality that is carefully kept out the debate on attacking Iran by writers like Mr. Kristof and the 200 billion dollar US Chinese trade lobby.
Hezbollah missile fire power selectively used against Israeli shipping clearly shows that Iran, without Chinese nuclear heads, has the military means to downgrade most of the oil infrastructure in the Persian and force a world depression, following a pre-emptive US attack. Mr. Kristof is deadly wrong about Middle East countries going nukes. The nuclearization of Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Turkey does not change the defenselessness of the Persian Gulf to missile attack. Only destroying Iran’s nuclear site creates the political conditions for China to arm Iran with nuclear defense. This would give China political hegemony in the Middle East region.
The emotional recklessness of the New York Times article shows no respect for the outpouring of Americans about 9/11 or the military reality 150,000 US troops would after an attack on Iran. Rather than the New York Times suggesting a US tax payer funded national defense shield be build to protect, Mr. Kristof should review that US plans to protect American interest in the Persian Gulf.
The best way to protect American oil interests in the Middle East is to restart and expand the Iraqi industrial economy. Put the Iragi workers but to work. It’s worked in both Germany and Japan following WWII; it called a real Marshall economic recovery plan.
posted by Nubianobserver at 4:38 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home